For those of you who like to/need to follow the matches out in internet land, I thought it might be interesting to see which host site would benefit you most come selection time. We all know the NCAA does it based on $/travelling distance/team records, but if it were up to me and the quality of the media coverage, it would look like this:
1. Emory (Did video for regular season games)
2. Christopher Newport (Did audio away at Stockton)
3. Messiah (Problematic audio)
4. Montclair/Rochester (Maybe you'll find out by letter carried by a man on a horse the next day)

1. Loras (Video with SID commentary)
2. Hobart (Local radio)
3. Ohio Northern (Did livestats 1 or 2 years ago)
4. Augsburg (First tournament, so who knows what they're capable of)
5. Redlands (Results by carrier pigeon)

1. Middlebury (Professional looking video with d3cast, instant replay (!), and commentary)
2. Carleton (Nice video with commentary)
2.5. Stevens (Did excellent quality video last year, commentary could be improved)
4. Johns Hopkins (Livestats)

1. Swarthmore (Reliable video/livestat combination)
2. Ohio Wesleyan (Nice video, no continuous score/time feed)
3. UT-Tyler (Audio/livestat combination)
4. Trinity/Amherst (Realtime score updates relayed via smoke signal. Pray it doesn't rain.)

Flying Weasel wrote:

---

. . . and there were shouts of joy and dancing in the streets . . .

Way to reinfornce my stereotypes of what Brazil looks like.

I don't know. BJF couldn't get anything either, but that included no audio. You might try using another player found on the internet that is compatible with Windows video, like VLC. I had tv quality with vista and WMP version 11.0.6000.6344 on default settings.

Oops, it was definitely me who goofed up on the Messiah/CNU start time. I think it was because someone had mentioned streaming 4 games at once today... so I had that in the back of my mind while just going along on autopilot, not consulting the team pages.